Not one of the recovered reviews left by a buyer of this bottle uses the word thinning. The listing, meanwhile, sells this 198 ml bottle almost entirely on thickness: "HELPS PROMOTE HAIR THICKENING" is the first bullet, with a 4.4-star badge built from 35,923 ratings sitting above it. If your parting is getting wider, the space between those two facts is the thing to understand before you spend anything.

A note on our working material, because it decided this review. Amazon surfaced only eight review cards for this listing rather than the hundred we would normally read, and this listing pools its reviews across at least seven different oils. Reading each card against the variant tag it was left under, three of the eight were written by buyers of the rosemary oil in the 198 ml bottle. Two of those three are five stars. The third, from the only reviewer who mentions thin hair, is a three. Our score lands at 4.0, with one firm condition attached.

What the Listing Claims, Right Down to the Small Print

Botanic Hearth picks its verbs carefully. Every performance bullet is hedged with "helps": the oil "helps thicken hair strands by strengthening hair follicles and fighting hair breakage", helps promote growth, helps fight dandruff by easing the dryness and inflammation behind it, and "helps provide long-lasting hydration" for texture. Nothing on the page says treats, cures or regrows. That hedging matters, and we will hold the reviews to the same standard the label sets for itself.

The formula is billed as 100% pure, cold-pressed rosemary oil carrying biotin, jojoba and castor oils, in an amber 198 ml (6.7 fl oz) bottle with two screw-on applicator heads, a pointed nozzle and a scalp comb. The credentials stack is long: Non-GMO Project Verified, a PETA-approved animal test policy, paraben free, sulfate free, colour safe and cruelty free.

The listing's claim images go further than its bullets. A before-and-after panel promises growth increases of 10.5% and 17.0% by day 15 and a 2.45% thickness increase by day 30, while another cites a 7.57% improvement in tensile strength and a 5.44% volumising effect "from the 1st use", footnoted to a study of 36 participants over 8 weeks by an unnamed independent agency. Treat all of those as the brand's own numbers. We cannot inspect the study, and nobody in the review sample measured anything.

Two printed claims are the ones this article can hold up against buyers: "Non-Sticky | Non-Greasy" on the front label, and the thickening promise the product is named for. Keep the current listing open alongside if you want the full spec sheet.

Featured

15% OFF*Limited offer

One Sunday. A week of food, sorted.

23 high-protein recipes, cycle-synced for women who lift.

23 recipes · 60-page PDF · Instant download

£19.20 £16.32

See it on Etsy→

*Seller's discount on Etsy - may end at any time.

The 4.4-Star Badge Is Not a Rating of This Oil

We could only recover eight review cards' worth of text from the product page: all from UK buyers, all verified purchases, spanning March 2025 to August 2026. Before any of them can be read as feedback on this bottle, something about the listing has to be dealt with first.

This listing is a family, not a product. Checked one by one against the variant each card was left under, the same page sells Rosemary, Organic Castor, Batana, a Rosemary and Castor blend, Rosemary Mint, Vitamin E and Rosemary Rice Water oils, in 60 ml, 198 ml and 200 ml bottles. Amazon pools the ratings across all of them. The 4.4-star badge sitting above 35,923 ratings is therefore not a rating of the rosemary oil. It is an average across at least seven different products, and nothing on the page tells you how much of it belongs to the one in your basket.

The review pile shows the same mixing in miniature. Its most-voted card, a four-star with 95 helpful votes titled "Castro oil", says "I recently tried Botanic Hearth Castor Oil" and reviews that separate, heavier product: thick, prone to dripping down your face, needing several shampoos to wash out. Two more five-star cards, from Dimon and Sharon Bayton, were left on the brand's batana oil. Not one of those three describes rosemary oil, and all three feed the badge.

Sorted by what each buyer actually bought, the eight cards fall out like this. Three are the exact product, rosemary oil in 198 ml: abbie65, kerryc and Lola. One, Jacky, is the same rosemary oil in the smaller 60 ml bottle, so her comments on amounts and bottle life come from that format. One, Sabbath, is the rosemary and castor blend. The remaining three are different oils entirely. The three exact-product cards score 5, 3 and 5, a mean of 4.33, or 4.6 if you widen it to all five rosemary-family cards. Neither figure is a performance estimate. At that size the arithmetic describes who happened to write, not how the oil behaves.

What Kind of Regrowth Buyers Report

The word none of the five-star stories uses is thinning. Among the rosemary cards, edges get one mention, and it is brief. Lola's entire review of the 198 ml bottle is five words, "I have more edges now", left on 10 August 2026. One buyer, one sentence, nothing on hair type, time frame or routine. It is a data point rather than a pattern, and this article is not going to inflate it into one.

Density gets one mention, and it belongs to a different formula. Sabbath, whose scalp had "suffered a lot", bought the rosemary and castor blend rather than the plain rosemary oil, applies it the night before, sleeps on a towel and showers in the morning: "My hair density is improving too and I'm noticing a lot of new growth." That is the account closest to what someone with sparse-feeling hair wants to hear, and it is about the blend.

abbie65's five stars need the most careful reading. They lost all their hair during chemotherapy treatment for cancer, and say it "was growing back slowly" before they started the oil; now, they write, "hair is growing in thicker now". That is their description of their own regrowth, and we pass it on exactly as they frame it, without attaching any claim about what caused what.

And Jacky, the longest of the rosemary cards and the sample's second most-voted at 33 helpful votes, written about the 60 ml rosemary bottle, is delighted for a reason that has nothing to do with sparse hair: a badly botched undercut she is desperate to grow out. Three weeks in she calls her hair "luscious, thick & shiny" and reports friends commenting on how fast it is growing. Cut hair growing back is not thinning hair recovering, so her enthusiasm, whatever its wattage, does not count toward the question this article is answering.

The Three Stars That Matter More Than the Fives

kerryc's review, left on 13 August 2026, is the only one from a buyer of this exact bottle who names their hair type, and it is the type this search is about: "I have thin hair but never had issues with my scalp until i started using this and iv used different rosemary oils before." kerryc went in expecting to like it, having read the same glowing feedback you are reading now.

What followed: the oil proved too harsh for their scalp, which they describe as now "tender and itchy". Washing it out takes two rounds of shampoo plus conditioner, and even then "the next day it looks all greasy". The texture is "very thick", their words for the oil itself rather than their hair. The strong smell they actually count as a positive.

Set kerryc's experience against the front label, which prints "Non-Sticky | Non-Greasy". Grease still turns up twice in the rosemary cards. Jacky's version, written about the 60 ml bottle, is conditional and dosage-based: a small amount is fine, but overdo it and "people will comment why you haven't dried your hair". kerryc's version is unconditional, grease the morning after a double shampoo. That makes kerryc's report the load-bearing one for this particular decision.

Five readers marked kerryc's review helpful inside three weeks of posting. A three-star among fives is easy to scroll past. When it is the only voice from your hair type, and one of only three cards left by people who bought this bottle, it is the one to stop on.

Applicators, Dosage and the Routines Buyers Settle Into

The printed routine is three steps, pitched as an everyday habit: squeeze the oil onto the spots that need it, massage it in and "let it settle for 2-6 hours", then rinse and wash as normal. The two heads split the job between them. The listing credits the nozzle with targeting the scalp and roots directly, and the comb with spreading the oil evenly, stimulating the scalp and reducing tangles on the way through.

The buyers who describe a routine do not follow that timetable. Sabbath, on the rosemary and castor blend, runs long past the six-hour window: application the night before, a towel over the pillow, then a shower the next morning.

Dosage decides how it wears between washes. Jacky's warning runs both ways: a small amount leaves hair looking normal, while too much reads as undried hair to everyone you meet. Put her caution next to kerryc's morning-after grease and the sensible pattern is small amounts through the nozzle, aimed at the scalp rather than the lengths, with a thorough wash booked in afterwards rather than a rinse and hope.

Two reviewers mention scent, and they split in an unexpected direction. kerryc, the least happy buyer here, counts the smell as the good part: "a very strong smell which i actually like". Jacky, the most enthusiastic, wishes it smelled "a little bit more of Rosemary". Neither describes what the strong base note resembles, so the only safe expectation to arrive with is: strong.

Where This Lands, and Who Should Pick the Pump Bottle Instead

The arithmetic first, because it is smaller than it looks. Three review cards were left by buyers of this exact bottle, at 5, 3 and 5 stars, a mean of 4.33. Widen the circle to every rosemary-family card and it is 4.6 across five. The listing's 4.4 badge cannot be used to fill the gap, because it pools across oils this article is not reviewing. So the verifiable evidence here is three people, one of whom had a bad time, and three cards is nowhere near enough to establish how often that happens. Reading it as a one-in-three failure rate would be as wrong as reading the fives as proof it works. We score it 4.0 out of 5, positive with a condition.

Buy it if you want a large bottle of rosemary oil and you are prepared to judge it yourself rather than lean on the star rating. Lola's five words about edges are what the exact-product cards offer, and Sabbath's overnight towel routine, from the blend, hands you a template. The 198 ml bottle holds plenty of oil for a proper multi-week trial. Check the variant selector reads Rosemary and 198 ml before you add to basket.

Skip it if next-day residue would show at your desk. That is kerryc's documented case: a scalp left "tender and itchy" and hair greasy the morning after a double shampoo, from a buyer with thin hair who had used other rosemary oils without trouble. If that reads like you, buy BIONOBLE Organic Rosemary Oil for Hair Growth instead. Its listing leads on non-greasiness, claiming a "NON-GREASY AND FAST-ABSORBING" oil that "penetrates the scalp quickly without weighing hair down" and "helps reduce breakage and thinning", supplied in a 200 ml glass bottle with a pump. Those are its listing's claims rather than conclusions from its reviews, but they answer the grease complaint keeping this product from an unconditional recommendation.

Everyone else gets a big bottle of a carefully hedged oil, three verified cards from people who bought exactly this one, and a headline star rating that belongs to seven different products.

Botanic Hearth Rosemary Hair Growth Oil, 198 ml

Two applicator heads, 198 ml of cold-pressed rosemary oil, and the fuller-edges report from a buyer of this exact bottle.

Check today's price on Amazon

Check Availability